The boxes can be separated into multiple columns via two equally fair method. On a large screen, it saves space to have multiple columns to reduce the space wasted to the left and to the right of the pictures. For the purposes of grouping the content meaningfully, all the cat boxes are separated from all the dog boxes such that the cat and dog boxes are not intermixed together. The pictures are kept to a maximum reasonable size even on large screens. Each box has an image, an overview, and a historical funfact.
Let us imagine a page composed of boxes of information each box is about a different feline breed or canine breed. Although it is off-topic, perhaps the following detailed example might give you insights and ideas that persuade you to forgo user agent sniffing. This effect can be easily achieved using CSS flexboxes, sometimes with floats as a partial fallback.Īlso try to move less relevant/important information down to the bottom and group the page's content together meaningfully. Rather, try to have fewer columns of information in a longer page on smaller screens while having more columns with a shorter page on larger screen sizes. That will only annoy people because it will force them to use the desktop version. What you want to do for screen size is not slash off information on smaller screens.
#Find version info firefox for mac code#
this code snippet splits a string in a special notation if (navigator. Also, rethink your design: can you use progressive enhancement or fluid layouts to help remove the need to do this? Avoiding user agent detection Can you prevent it by adding some non-semantic or elements? The difficulty of successfully using user agent detection is worth a few disruptions to the purity of your HTML. In these cases, you should first analyze your situation to be sure it's really necessary. This is usually a bad practice, but there are some cases in which this is necessary. Do you want to provide different HTML depending on which browser is being used? There is always the alternative of doing feature detection instead. In addition, it is not practical to test every one of the less popular browsers and test for those Web features. This is the worst reason to use user agent detection because odds are eventually all the other browsers will catch up.
Your site needs to use a specific Web feature that some browsers don't yet support, and you want to send those users to an older Web site with fewer features but that you know will work. Are you trying to check for the existence of a specific feature? Browser makers do pay attention to bug reports, and the analysis may hint about other workarounds for the bug. If the problem seems uncommon, it's worth checking if this bug has been reported to the browser vendor via their bug tracking system ( Mozilla WebKit Blink Opera). Also, experts, or people with another point of view, can give you ideas for working around the bug. Look, or ask, in specialized forums: you're unlikely to be the first to hit this problem.
Are you trying to work around a specific bug in some version of a browser?
Start by trying to identify why you want to do it. When considering using the user agent string to detect which browser is being used, your first step is to try to avoid it if possible.
0 kommentar(er)
